中文迷失在折叠中：交叉验证并非深度集成用于不确定性估计

该研究指出，医学图像分割中常用K折交叉验证（CV）形成集成并误称为“深度集成”，其分歧混合了种子随机性与数据暴露效应，改变了不确定性解释方式。审计发现术语与实现普遍不匹配。实际意义：需区分集成类型以正确解读不确定性。

arXiv:2605.18329v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Ensemble disagreement is widely used as a proxy for epistemic uncertainty in medical image segmentation. In practice, many studies form ensembles via K-fold cross-validation (CV), yet refer to them as ``deep ensembles'' (DE). Because CV members are trained on different data subsets, their disagreement mixes seed-driven variability with data-exposure effects, which can change how uncertainty should be interpreted. We audit recent segmentation uncertainty studies and find that terminology--implementation mismatches are common. We then compare a